I was about to cast this post in a “Copycat or Coincidence” category, but then backed out at the last minute. These are obviously two distinctly different shoes: the shapes are original to both, as are the upper construction, heel form & shoe type.
But then I ask: why would Roger Vivier's team design a Spring 2012 royal blue satin heel with a square diamante buckle, when Manolo Blahnik‘s iconic version (of Sex & the City fame nonetheless!) is still in production? I really don't have the answer to this. It's as if the people at Vivier asked their designers to create a shoe “like” Manolo‘s, but to “change it enough” to become somewhat original to their brand.
Copycat or not, I think that Vivier‘s design, even though reminiscent of the Blahnik stiletto, is an amazing update to the latter & possibly “original”.
Thoughts?!
Photo Credits: Holtsmuse.com, Neimanmarcus.com
xo ShoeTease
Cristina is the chief editor, fashion & shoe expert here at ShoeTease. As a seasoned stylist and women's fashion & shoe designer, she boasts over 20 years of experience in the fashion industry. She loves crafting effortless outfits for ladies both online and off and believes that styling advice should be accessible to everyone. Whether you're a styling pro or just starting out, Cristina's here to guide you on your fashion journey! Learn more.
This post may contain affiliate links. ShoeTease may earn a small commission if you click through and/or make a purchase. Thanks for your support!
Antoinette
Sunday 4th of March 2012
Staying with the original Manolo.
ShoeTease
Friday 9th of March 2012
The original seems to take the cake on this showdown!